OpenSSL supports creating a custom cipher via the legacy
EVP_CIPHER_meth_new() function and associated function calls. This function
was deprecated in OpenSSL 3.0 and application authors are instead encouraged
to use the new provider mechanism in order to implement custom ciphers.
OpenSSL versions 3.0.0 to 3.0.5 incorrectly handle legacy custom ciphers
passed to the EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2() and
EVP_CipherInit_ex2() functions (as well as other similarly named encryption
and decryption initialisation functions). Instead of using the custom cipher
directly it incorrectly tries to fetch an equivalent cipher from the
available providers. An equivalent cipher is found based on the NID passed to
EVP_CIPHER_meth_new(). This NID is supposed to represent the unique NID for a
given cipher. However it is possible for an application to incorrectly pass
NID_undef as this value in the call to EVP_CIPHER_meth_new(). When NID_undef
is used in this way the OpenSSL encryption/decryption initialisation function
will match the NULL cipher as being equivalent and will fetch this from the
available providers. This will succeed if the default provider has been
loaded (or if a third party provider has been loaded that offers this
cipher). Using the NULL cipher means that the plaintext is emitted as the
ciphertext.
Applications are only affected by this issue if they call
EVP_CIPHER_meth_new() using NID_undef and subsequently use it in a call to an
encryption/decryption initialisation function. Applications that only use
SSL/TLS are not impacted by this issue.
([CVE-2022-3358])
# Applications that only use SSL/TLS are not impacted by this issue.
Posté par louson . Évalué à 2.
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a92e538a757bc3bdc9c7d6370154a0e8b4dd2c26
[^] # Re: Applications that only use SSL/TLS are not impacted by this issue.
Posté par CrEv (site web personnel) . Évalué à 5.
Hum, si je ne me trompe ce n'est pas celle-ci.
Celle-ci est déclarée corrigée en
3.0.6
et est de sévéritélow
: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.htmlCelle dont il est question dans le lien est de sévérité
critical
et est corrigée en3.0.7
A ma connaissance il n'y a pas encore d'identifiant de CVE publié.
# Pas encore levés côté transatlantique ?
Posté par Benoît Sibaud (site web personnel) . Évalué à 3.
Rien encore pour novembre sur https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-announce/
Rien encore sur https://github.com/openssl/openssl/
A priori rien sur https://www.opencve.io/cve?vendor=openssl&cvss=critical&search=
[^] # Re: Pas encore levés côté transatlantique ?
Posté par Benoît Sibaud (site web personnel) . Évalué à 4.
This release will be made available on Tuesday 1st November 2022 between
1300-1700 UTC.
Je suis juste trop impatient. Entre 15min et 4h15 d'impatience en plus
Suivre le flux des commentaires
Note : les commentaires appartiennent à celles et ceux qui les ont postés. Nous n’en sommes pas responsables.