Aujourd'hui, Eclipse est l'une des plateformes les plus utilisées non seulement pour les projets Java ou C++, mais, par l'intermédiaire d'éditeurs basés sur la plateforme Eclipse comme le logiciel propriétaire Aptana, pour des projets utilisant des langages orientés web comme PHP ou encore Ruby On Rails.
Ganymede est la mise à disposition au public de manière simultanée plus d'une vingtaine de projets liés à Eclipse. Ce système a été choisi pour minimiser les problèmes de compatibilité lors des installations et mises à jour. La liste des nouveautés n'a pas été compilée au sein d'une note de version complète mais il est possible de les retrouver de manière fragmentaire d'après les notes des 7 "milestones" qui ont précédé.
Voici une compilation :
- SWT, la couche graphique d'Eclipse est maintenant capable de créer des applications plein écran pour des applications de type Kiosque et de gérer la transparence ou d'autre effets sur les composants graphiques dont les fenêtres ;
- SWT fonctionne maintenant sur Windows 64 bits si Eclipse utilise une JVM 64 bits. Il est toujours possible de faire fonctionner SWT en 32 bits avec une JVM 32 bits sur un Windows 64 bits ;
- La compilation Java utilise maintenant plusieurs "threads" ce qui améliora les performances sur les processeurs multicoeur ;
- Possibilité de transformer des expressions de concaténation "a+b+c" en expressions équivalentes utilisant les objets StringBuilder/StringBuffer ou MessageFormat pour suivre les bonnes pratiques ;
- De nouvelles aides à la transformation de code (le point fort d'Eclipse) comme la possibilités de déplacer un groupe de variable dans une classe indépendantes avec des accesseurs publiques ;
- Possibilité de réordonner les éléments d'une classe en glisser-déplacer dans la fenêtre "Outline view" ;
- JUnit affiche le temps pour chacun des tests lancés ;
- Le code source de la plateforme est maintenant disponible sous forme de plusieurs paquets au lieu d'un seul ce qui facilitera certainement les personnes intéressées par certaines parties de code ;
- Des améliorations sur le composants de gestions des greffons permettra de les démarrer ou de les arrêter (comme ce sont des services de type OSGI) mais pas de les installer ou désinstaller dynamiquement (ce qui est pourtant gérer par OSGI) ;
- La plateforme dispose d'un nouveau module P2 qui remplace l'ancien module de mise à jour qui était très limité et permettra notamment de partager des modules entre applications basées sur Eclipse ce qui permettra un réel gain d'espace disque.
Aller plus loin
- La page de téléchargement (30 clics)
- Greffons Eclipse (8 clics)
- Portail Eclipse (5 clics)
# Paquet d'aspirines...
Posté par ploum (site web personnel, Mastodon) . Évalué à -4.
J'utilise beaucoup eclipse dans mon boulot pour démontrer quels sont les trucs "à ne pas faire" dans une interface graphique. J'ai l'impression qu'un type en a fait la liste et que les dev d'Eclipse sont tombés dessus. Absolument toutes les pires choses imaginables dans une interface sont dans Eclipse.
Le sommet est que les applications basées sur Eclipse héritent de cette philosophie. Lotus Notes 8 par exemple.
Le fait que Eclipse aie le moindre succès est pour moi la preuve absolue qu'il ne faut jamais jamais jamais laisser les ingénieurs s'occuper d'une interface utilisateur.
Mes livres CC By-SA : https://ploum.net/livres.html
[^] # Re: Paquet d'aspirines...
Posté par Émilien Kia (site web personnel) . Évalué à 10.
Car perso, je ne la trouve pas si inutilisable que ça.
Un jour libre ?
[^] # Re: Paquet d'aspirines...
Posté par Loic Dreux . Évalué à 6.
[^] # Re: Paquet d'aspirines...
Posté par boubou (site web personnel) . Évalué à 7.
Je ne suis pas sûr de bien comprendre la logique de cette phrase. Parce que si le succès est une preuve d'adaptation à la cible (ici les développeurs Java), alors, vu son succès, Eclipse est bien adapté à sa cible, que tu n'aimes ou pas son interface (d'ailleurs, un exemple ou deux de trucs pourris serait bienvenu, mais bon...).
[^] # Re: Paquet d'aspirines...
Posté par Jean B . Évalué à 6.
Éclipse n'est pas populaire qu'au près des développeurs Java. On le rencontre aussi très fréquemment dans le développement Web (PHP, Python, Ruby, xHTML).
D'ailleurs je me verrait mal coder du PHP sans lui (et son auto complétion) vu la cohérence de l'api standard.
[^] # Re: Paquet d'aspirines...
Posté par boubou (site web personnel) . Évalué à 4.
[^] # Re: Paquet d'aspirines...
Posté par rhizome . Évalué à 3.
En même temps, Eclipse est loin d'être le seul à fournir l'autocomplétion, une interface graphique pour la gestion des révisions, etc.
> vu la cohérence de l'api standard.
Hé bin, Eclipse + PHP, tu as bien du mérite :-)
[^] # Re: Paquet d'aspirines...
Posté par Earered . Évalué à 5.
Les smart bookmark d'ephy : http://www.gnome.org/projects/epiphany/smartbookmarks.html
ne sont pas dans Eclipse.
Pourtant, d'après les études de Findlater et McGrenere en 2004 et McGrenere, Baecker et Booth en 2002 c'est le pire choix possible.
Voir http://www.usability.gov/pdfs/chapter12.pdf section 6
> [...] Le sommet est que les applications basées sur Eclipse héritent de cette philosophie. Lotus Notes 8 par exemple.
Vous ne connaissez pas l'historique de Lotus apparemment (version 6 et 7, l'état étrange de son interface vient de là).
> Le fait que Eclipse aie le moindre succès est pour moi la preuve absolue qu'il ne faut jamais jamais jamais laisser les ingénieurs s'occuper d'une interface utilisateur.
Jaloux?
[^] # Re: Paquet d'aspirines...
Posté par BAud (site web personnel) . Évalué à 3.
pareil avec Lotus Notes 5 en fait hein :-)
c'est un peu la logique de TIMTOWTDI de Perl_(langage) mais à l'envers : l'option apparaît parfois sur clic droit, sur un bouton avec menu, dans les menus mais celle que tu cherches et dont tu as besoin est forcément ailleurs... (de préférence dans une fenêtre avec double rangée d'onglets, sinon c'est pas drôle).
[^] # Re: Paquet d'aspirines...
Posté par Stéphane Davy . Évalué à 3.
Exemple: je fais un tableau, et j'ai ensuite envie d'ajouter une colonne: dans le menu contextuel-bouton-droit, je ne peux qu'ajouter avant la colonne sur laquelle je suis. Dans le menu de la barre de menu, je peux aussi ajouter après....
Ploum, toi qui cherches un exemple de ce qu'il ne faut pas faire en terme d'interface utilisateur, Notes est une vraie mine d'or.
Un jour peut être je vous parlerai peut être du copier / coller....
[^] # Re: Paquet d'aspirines...
Posté par Earered . Évalué à 3.
Je m'en doute ^_^ , mais je ne l'ai pas (trop) subit en v5 (je soupçonne même que les problèmes existent depuis le début).
Pour continuer sur le sujet de l'ergonomie, d'IBM et d'Eclipse, il y a des gens qui savent à quoi ressemblait aDesigner sur alphawork et qui suivent ce qu'il en est maintenant? http://www.eclipse.org/actf/
Futur abandonware?
[^] # Re: Paquet d'aspirines...
Posté par ccomb (site web personnel) . Évalué à 10.
[^] # Re: Paquet d'aspirines...
Posté par remouk (site web personnel) . Évalué à 1.
[^] # Re: Paquet d'aspirines...
Posté par Snarky . Évalué à 10.
[^] # Re: Paquet d'aspirines...
Posté par Guillaume Denry (site web personnel) . Évalué à 10.
[^] # Re: Paquet d'aspirines...
Posté par Goffi (site web personnel, Mastodon) . Évalué à 10.
[^] # Re: Paquet d'aspirines...
Posté par Bob . Évalué à 1.
[^] # Re: Paquet d'aspirines...
Posté par Étienne . Évalué à 4.
http://vimdoc.sourceforge.net/htmldoc/options.html#%27titleo(...)
Lorsqu'on quitte vim, le titre de la fenêtre devient "Thanks for flying Vim", ce qui donne un début de réponse.
[^] # Re: Paquet d'aspirines...
Posté par Cédric Brun (site web personnel) . Évalué à 2.
http://www.satokar.com/viplugin/
[^] # Re: Paquet d'aspirines...
Posté par Earered . Évalué à 6.
http://eclim.sourceforge.net/
[^] # Re: Paquet d'aspirines...
Posté par Florent Zara (site web personnel, Mastodon) . Évalué à 5.
Étonnant que personne n'ait encore sortie la "Galerie de la Honte" des IHM : http://homepage.mac.com/bradster/iarchitect/shame.htm
Une page qui recense toutes les incohérences et pires erreurs à éviter dans une interface, avec de nombreux exemples à l'appui et parfois des solutions alternatives. C'est classé par catégorie (messages, onglets, couleurs, mauvaises utilisations, etc.) et aussi quelques études plus approfondies de certains logiciels. On retrouvera notamment Lotus (version 4.6) parmi ceux-ci : http://homepage.mac.com/bradster/iarchitect/lotus.htm
Si effectivement les choses ont bien changées depuis, on retrouve toujours des problématiques identiques et certains défauts sont toujours présents dans Lotus (je dois utiliser la v7 en ce moment).
Alors la combinaison des 2 cultures (Eclipse + Lotus) ne doit pas forcément être parfaite et des défauts d'IHM de Lotus doivent perdurer, même si maintenant c'est le socle technique d'Eclipse qui est utilisé.
[^] # Re: Paquet d'aspirines...
Posté par lezardbreton . Évalué à 8.
- tout ceux que je connais et qui utilisent quotidiennement Eclipse sont devenus fans alors que leur impression initiale était négative
- alors que je dirais que c'est l'inverse pour GNOME que tu aimes tant : première impression positive puis à l'usage on se rend compte qu'il manque plein de choses, que c'est mal fini, que ça manque de fonctionnalités, que des choix absurdes ont été fait, etc...
Chacun son truc, mais je préfère les impressions sur le long terme.
[^] # Re: Paquet d'aspirines...
Posté par Clément BRUGUERA . Évalué à 2.
J'ai essayé une floppée d'IDE et c'est franchement celui qui me convient le mieux.
[^] # Re: Paquet d'aspirines...
Posté par herodiade . Évalué à 4.
Ça se comprends ; ed(1) et eclipse, c'est bonnet blanc et blanc bonnet.
[^] # Re: Paquet d'aspirines...
Posté par rhizome . Évalué à 2.
[^] # Re: Paquet d'aspirines...
Posté par suJeSelS . Évalué à 8.
[^] # Re: Paquet d'aspirines...
Posté par SKBo . Évalué à 1.
[1] http://ehiti.de/katmouse/
* Oui, je sais, pas libre, toussa, mais bon, il a pas le choix, alors bon…
[^] # Re: Paquet d'aspirines...
Posté par Joël Thieffry (site web personnel) . Évalué à 2.
Comme tu vois c'est très simple à mettre en place, si on n'est pas allergique aux interfaces clickodromes, et ça donne tout de suite un bon goût de X11 à ton windows. Une des premières chose que je fais après une install chez moi.
[^] # Re: Paquet d'aspirines...
Posté par youx21 . Évalué à 2.
[^] # Re: Paquet d'aspirines..
Posté par rhizome . Évalué à 4.
# curieux d'entendre tes remarques
Posté par Amine Mokhtari . Évalué à 3.
certes il donne l'impression d'être relativement chargé niveau interface ce qu ipeut être assimilé à du bruit visuel (je ne suis pas expert en IHM :-D), mais cela est très facilement configurable. !!!!
mais d'un point de vue pratique je trouve qu'il est très bien fait.
[^] # Re: curieux d'entendre tes remarques
Posté par Fabrice Mousset (site web personnel) . Évalué à -3.
Personnellement, j'utilise une version d'Eclipse personnalisée par Altera (NIOS IDE pour ceux qui connaissent) et je trouve l'ensemble fort bien fait et allant vraiment dans le sens de la productivité.
Bref je comprends pas les soit disant reproches... besoin de se faire de la pub ou alors envie de lancer un gros troll poilu ?
[^] # Re: curieux d'entendre tes remarques
Posté par Olivier MARTIN . Évalué à 0.
[^] # Re: curieux d'entendre tes remarques
Posté par Étienne . Évalué à 8.
[^] # Re: curieux d'entendre tes remarques
Posté par Laurent J (site web personnel, Mastodon) . Évalué à 2.
(oui, c'est un peu exagéré, mais c'est mon impression et je la partage)
[^] # Re: curieux d'entendre tes remarques
Posté par Étienne . Évalué à 2.
Etienne
[^] # Re: curieux d'entendre tes remarques
Posté par abramov_MS . Évalué à 2.
[^] # Re: curieux d'entendre tes remarques
Posté par Toufou (site web personnel) . Évalué à 2.
Jamais le vendredi ...
M'enfin il n'a pas tort je trouve aussi les interfaces d'eclipse un peu obscures, surtout les interfaces cachées de la une.
/me retourne dehors prendre un café
[^] # Re: curieux d'entendre tes remarques
Posté par _gryzor_ . Évalué à 1.
Au fait quelqu'un a essayé de déclarer ses impots en ligne cette année depuis un AMD64?
[^] # Re: curieux d'entendre tes remarques
Posté par Earered . Évalué à 2.
via chroot i386: http://www.corsac.net/index.php?rub=blog&post=1404
[^] # Re: curieux d'entendre tes remarques
Posté par fearan . Évalué à -1.
J'ai pas trouvé comment récupérer des binding emacs ( oui j'y suis habitué, notamment ctrl-a ctrl-e, alt-gauche alt-droit ( enfin tout ce qui est déplacement), les mise en majuscule/minuscule/seulement la premiere lettre
Je n'ai pas récupéré l'équivalent de ebrowse ( un truc emacs qui donne une très bonne représentation des classe c++)
la remonté des tags avec pile ( je pénétre de plus en plus dans le code S-F8 chez moi, et je remonte la pile avec S-F7 )
L'ouverture de fichier aussi m'est galère pour mois qui n'utilise presque pas la souris.
Les recherches qui sont loin d'atteindre celle que je fait avec mon environnement.
Je précise que je n'utilise pas que emacs, y a aussi une série de scripts bash qui vont avec mon environnement de dev, j'aurais du mal à tout énumérer, mais je donne les 2 plus courant
*snip a b c ... qui recherche a ou b ou c ou ... qui est équivalent a grep (a)|(b)|(c) ( en gérant les options données )
* edit qui m'ouvre les fichiers en paramètre dans l'éditeur ouvert (et en ouvre 1 si y en a pas) qui me fait la complétion de fichier sur les paramètres
Bon enfin tout ça pour dire que j'ai déjà adapté mon environnement de travail à mes besoins, et que éclipse ne s'y plie pas facilement. ( Oui je sais emacs non plus mais je l'ai déjà plié, et il m'a moins emm*bip* pour la coloration :D )
Il ne faut pas décorner les boeufs avant d'avoir semé le vent
# Ganymède, tellement plus qu'Eclipse
Posté par Cédric Brun (site web personnel) . Évalué à 10.
Avec Ganymède viennent des projets extrêmement intéressants et innovants, Mylyn par exemple qui permet d'intégrer l'IDE avec bugzilla/trac ou autre. Ainsi on récupère directement les tâches/bugs et l'IDE adapte son comportement lorsqu'on lui indique que l'on commence à travailler sur une tâche donnée. Les fichiers concernés par cette tâches sont identifié au fur et à mesure du codage, si l'on passe d'une tâche à l'autre on récupère ce "contexte" qui cache les éléments non pertinents.
C'est toute l'organisation du développement qui peut s'adapter à cette philosophie "dirigée par les tâches".
Autre projet sympa : "Eclipse Communication Framework" qui permet (entre autre) de se connecter à IRC, Jabber et beaucoup d'autres IM directement depuis Eclipse. L'intérêt est - par exemple - de pouvoir éditer le même code simultanément à 2 personnes via Jabber.
Concernant la modélisation cette version apporte des améliorations remarquables, ainsi un modeleur graphique est désormais fournis pour Ecore, n'importe quel modèle peut être comparé/fusionné grâce à EMF Compare (mon projet :) ) et ATL - langage de transformation de modèles largement utilisé - est livré dans une version plus sympa pour l'utilisateur avec completion et tout le tintouin.
Autre fonctionnalité qui me change la vie : le API tooling, il est désormais possible de définir une "baseline" de l'API d'un ensemble de plugins (qui correspond à une release majeure par exemple) et l'outillage va prévenir le développeur quand ses changements sur le code source impliquent un changement d'API binaire.
Cette liste est tout sauf exhaustive, on trouve le CDT pour le développement du C et du C++, toute un ensemble d'outils dédiés au développements orientés services (SOA et SCA) sans même parler de WTP pour ce qui est du développement Web et JEE.
En bref Ganymède c'est tellement plus que ce que cette nouvelle laisse entrevoir, c'est des dizaines de personnes qui s'assurent que leurs composants respectifs sont compatibles et fonctionnent bien ensemble pour fournir une version majeure avec pléthore de fonctionnalités en Juin.
# c'est installé
Posté par ®om (site web personnel) . Évalué à 5.
http://images.imagup.com/04/1214560747_eclipse-proxy.png
Le gestionnaire d'updates a également été refait.
J'en ai profité pour installer subversive (alors qu'avant j'utilisais subclipse) pour le SVN, il est plus complet et j'espère qu'il est moins buggué :D
PS: pourquoi «Votre commentaire aura une note de 1.»?
blog.rom1v.com
[^] # Re: c'est installé
Posté par Jean B . Évalué à 3.
[^] # Re: c'est installé
Posté par Maclag . Évalué à 1.
T'es pas super lourd mais tu peux mieux faire!
et BONNE JOURNÉE!!
# Français ?
Posté par Matthieu . Évalué à 2.
[^] # Re: Français ?
Posté par Cédric Brun (site web personnel) . Évalué à 5.
http://www.eclipse.org/babel/downloads.php
on peut utiliser l'update site et directement installer la langue française. A noter que la traduction est désormais un effort entièrement communautaire (avant c'était IBM) et qu'un interface web à été mise en place pour faciliter les contributions :
http://babel.eclipse.org/babel/
# Petit retour
Posté par Jean-Philippe (site web personnel) . Évalué à 5.
D'abord le contexte, j'utilise eclipse quotidiennement pour du dev web (dans une petite société coopérative) PHP et ruby on rails avec quelques plugins (aptana, et PDT sur la 3.3).
Un scrot de la 3.4 (j'ai pas montré les projets sur lesquels je travaille vraiment :p ) avec mon workspace habituel sur 2 écrans et quelques particularités de la 3.4, la recherche modifiée et la view Markers : http://fichiers.skateinmars.net/images/eclipse-3.4.png
Donc pour les différences :
- Niveau feeling général, le lancement est aussi lent, une fois le programme lancé ca semble un tout petit peu plus réactif.
- La première différence dont on se rend compte c'est le gestionnaire d'updates. Il a surement du potentiel mais il est pas super fini : on ne peut plus désactiver un plugin en le laissant installé, la gestion des dépendances marche mieux mais n'essaye plus d'afficher quel composant manque, il se contente d'afficher une erreur java imbitable. J'ai un comportement innatendu également : en installant aptana j'ai désélectionné quelques plugins : Jaxer, le support de quelques frameworks, mais il me les as quand même installé et impossible de les désinstaller. J'imagine que ce sont des dépendances du composant principal (ou pas)
- Niveau interface elle-même c'est plus ou moins la même chose, et niveau customisation du workspace c'est autant le bordel, il faudrait vraiment refondre la gestion des menus/toolbars. Au final on arrive quand même a avoir ce que l'on veut (et plus)
- Dans les éditeurs je ne suis pas arrivé à virer le highlight gris moche sur mes variables/tags que je ne veut pourtant pas partout (c'est peut-etre ma faute sur ce coup, je n'ai pas super exploré la chose)
- Niveau bugs j'en ai vu 2/3 mais qui semblent dûs a des plugins pas mis à jour, donc a priori plus stable que la version précédente qui freezait de temps en temps :)
- La nouvelle recherche a l'air sympa mais je n'ai pas eu l'occasion de vraiment m'en servir
D'autres impressions aussi mais pas forcément liées à eclipse 3.4 :
- Mylin a l'air super interressant, mon seul regret c'est que l'on utilise pas beaucoup trac en interne (on passe par basecamp)
- Subversive est pas mal mais quand même plus lent que subclipse. J'aime quand meme bien les boutons commit/update/etc dans la toolbar. Un truc chiant : dans la fenêtre commit, un double clic sur un fichier le compare avec la version sur le dépot, il mouline donc pour la ramener... il faut faire clic droit, compare with "Base from working copy" pour avoir le même comportement que subclipse.
Chiant aussi la non disponibilité des connecteurs par défaut (il faut les récuperer depuis un site qui semble obsolète)
Voila sinon ca reste du eclipse, efficace mais toujours plein de features dont personne se sert :-)
Ps: ouarf, désolé de poster un texte qui voulait être sérieux un vendredi (-:
[^] # Re: Petit retour
Posté par Jean-Philippe (site web personnel) . Évalué à 2.
Et également sur PDT (PHP Dev Tools) : je venais d'y migrer (et il est très sympa à part le drag and drop de texte, mais la version stable est incompatible avec eclipse 3.4 :(
Je suis revenu sur phpeclipse du coup qui marche bien. Quelqu'un aurait un retour sur la stabilité des nightly/intégration builds de PDT ?
[^] # Re: Petit retour
Posté par s[e]th & h[o]lth (site web personnel) . Évalué à 2.
Merci pour le post, ça va être la révolution chez moi !
# Aptana propriétaire ?
Posté par Julien Wajsberg . Évalué à 1.
Il me semblait bien que c'était un logiciel libre...
[^] # Re: Aptana propriétaire ?
Posté par BAud (site web personnel) . Évalué à 2.
tu as donc trouvé un lien vers la licence ?
[^] # Re: Aptana propriétaire ?
Posté par Jean-Philippe (site web personnel) . Évalué à -8.
This program Copyright (c) 2005-2008 Aptana, Inc. This program is distributed under both the Aptana Public License and the GNU General Public license. For the GPL license, this program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License, Version 3, as published by the Free Software Foundation. For the Aptana Public License (APL), this program and the accompanying materials are made available under the terms of the APL v1.0 which accompanies this distribution. Redistribution, except as permitted by the above license, is prohibited.
Any modifications must keep this entire license intact.
* GNU Public License/Aptana Exception (http://www.aptana.com/legal/gpl/)
* Aptana Public License (http://www.aptana.com/legal/apl/)
GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
Version 3, 29 June 2007
Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. <http://fsf.org/>
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.
Preamble
The GNU General Public License is a free, copyleft license for software and other kinds of works.
The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed to take away your freedom to share and change the works. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change all versions of a program--to make sure it remains free software for all its users. We, the Free Software Foundation, use the GNU General Public License for most of our software; it applies also to any other work released this way by its authors. You can apply it to your programs, too.
When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for them if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs, and that you know you can do these things.
To protect your rights, we need to prevent others from denying you these rights or asking you to surrender the rights. Therefore, you have certain responsibilities if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it: responsibilities to respect the freedom of others.
For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must pass on to the recipients the same freedoms that you received. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights.
Developers that use the GNU GPL protect your rights with two steps: (1) assert copyright on the software, and (2) offer you this License giving you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify it.
For the developers' and authors' protection, the GPL clearly explains that there is no warranty for this free software. For both users' and authors' sake, the GPL requires that modified versions be marked as changed, so that their problems will not be attributed erroneously to authors of previous versions.
Some devices are designed to deny users access to install or run modified versions of the software inside them, although the manufacturer can do so. This is fundamentally incompatible with the aim of protecting users' freedom to change the software. The systematic pattern of such abuse occurs in the area of products for individuals to use, which is precisely where it is most unacceptable. Therefore, we have designed this version of the GPL to prohibit the practice for those products. If such problems arise substantially in other domains, we stand ready to extend this provision to those domains in future versions of the GPL, as needed to protect the freedom of users.
Finally, every program is threatened constantly by software patents. States should not allow patents to restrict development and use of software on general-purpose computers, but in those that do, we wish to avoid the special danger that patents applied to a free program could make it effectively proprietary. To prevent this, the GPL assures that patents cannot be used to render the program non-free.
The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and modification follow.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
0. Definitions.
"This License" refers to version 3 of the GNU General Public License.
"Copyright" also means copyright-like laws that apply to other kinds of works, such as semiconductor masks.
"The Program" refers to any copyrightable work licensed under this License. Each licensee is addressed as "you". "Licensees" and "recipients" may be individuals or organizations.
To "modify" a work means to copy from or adapt all or part of the work in a fashion requiring copyright permission, other than the making of an exact copy. The resulting work is called a "modified version" of the earlier work or a work "based on" the earlier work.
A "covered work" means either the unmodified Program or a work based on the Program.
To "propagate" a work means to do anything with it that, without permission, would make you directly or secondarily liable for infringement under applicable copyright law, except executing it on a computer or modifying a private copy. Propagation includes copying, distribution (with or without modification), making available to the public, and in some countries other activities as well.
To "convey" a work means any kind of propagation that enables other parties to make or receive copies. Mere interaction with a user through a computer network, with no transfer of a copy, is not conveying.
An interactive user interface displays "Appropriate Legal Notices" to the extent that it includes a convenient and prominently visible feature that (1) displays an appropriate copyright notice, and (2) tells the user that there is no warranty for the work (except to the extent that warranties are provided), that licensees may convey the work under this License, and how to view a copy of this License. If the interface presents a list of user commands or options, such as a menu, a prominent item in the list meets this criterion.
1. Source Code.
The "source code" for a work means the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it. "Object code" means any non-source form of a work.
A "Standard Interface" means an interface that either is an official standard defined by a recognized standards body, or, in the case of interfaces specified for a particular programming language, one that is widely used among developers working in that language.
The "System Libraries" of an executable work include anything, other than the work as a whole, that (a) is included in the normal form of packaging a Major Component, but which is not part of that Major Component, and (b) serves only to enable use of the work with that Major Component, or to implement a Standard Interface for which an implementation is available to the public in source code form. A "Major Component", in this context, means a major essential component (kernel, window system, and so on) of the specific operating system (if any) on which the executable work runs, or a compiler used to produce the work, or an object code interpreter used to run it.
The "Corresponding Source" for a work in object code form means all the source code needed to generate, install, and (for an executable work) run the object code and to modify the work, including scripts to control those activities. However, it does not include the work's System Libraries, or general-purpose tools or generally available free programs which are used unmodified in performing those activities but which are not part of the work. For example, Corresponding Source includes interface definition files associated with source files for the work, and the source code for shared libraries and dynamically linked subprograms that the work is specifically designed to require, such as by intimate data communication or control flow between those subprograms and other parts of the work.
The Corresponding Source need not include anything that users can regenerate automatically from other parts of the Corresponding Source.
The Corresponding Source for a work in source code form is that same work.
2. Basic Permissions.
All rights granted under this License are granted for the term of copyright on the Program, and are irrevocable provided the stated conditions are met. This License explicitly affirms your unlimited permission to run the unmodified Program. The output from running a covered work is covered by this License only if the output, given its content, constitutes a covered work. This License acknowledges your rights of fair use or other equivalent, as provided by copyright law.
You may make, run and propagate covered works that you do not convey, without conditions so long as your license otherwise remains in force. You may convey covered works to others for the sole purpose of having them make modifications exclusively for you, or provide you with facilities for running those works, provided that you comply with the terms of this License in conveying all material for which you do not control copyright. Those thus making or running the covered works for you must do so exclusively on your behalf, under your direction and control, on terms that prohibit them from making any copies of your copyrighted material outside their relationship with you.
Conveying under any other circumstances is permitted solely under the conditions stated below. Sublicensing is not allowed; section 10 makes it unnecessary.
3. Protecting Users' Legal Rights From Anti-Circumvention Law.
No covered work shall be deemed part of an effective technological measure under any applicable law fulfilling obligations under article 11 of the WIPO copyright treaty adopted on 20 December 1996, or similar laws prohibiting or restricting circumvention of such measures.
When you convey a covered work, you waive any legal power to forbid circumvention of technological measures to the extent such circumvention is effected by exercising rights under this License with respect to the covered work, and you disclaim any intention to limit operation or modification of the work as a means of enforcing, against the work's users, your or third parties' legal rights to forbid circumvention of technological measures.
4. Conveying Verbatim Copies.
You may convey verbatim copies of the Program's source code as you receive it, in any medium, provided that you conspicuously and appropriately publish on each copy an appropriate copyright notice; keep intact all notices stating that this License and any non-permissive terms added in accord with section 7 apply to the code; keep intact all notices of the absence of any warranty; and give all recipients a copy of this License along with the Program.
You may charge any price or no price for each copy that you convey, and you may offer support or warranty protection for a fee.
5. Conveying Modified Source Versions.
You may convey a work based on the Program, or the modifications to produce it from the Program, in the form of source code under the terms of section 4, provided that you also meet all of these conditions:
* a) The work must carry prominent notices stating that you modified it, and giving a relevant date.
* b) The work must carry prominent notices stating that it is released under this License and any conditions added under section 7. This requirement modifies the requirement in section 4 to "keep intact all notices".
* c) You must license the entire work, as a whole, under this License to anyone who comes into possession of a copy. This License will therefore apply, along with any applicable section 7 additional terms, to the whole of the work, and all its parts, regardless of how they are packaged. This License gives no permission to license the work in any other way, but it does not invalidate such permission if you have separately received it.
* d) If the work has interactive user interfaces, each must display Appropriate Legal Notices; however, if the Program has interactive interfaces that do not display Appropriate Legal Notices, your work need not make them do so.
A compilation of a covered work with other separate and independent works, which are not by their nature extensions of the covered work, and which are not combined with it such as to form a larger program, in or on a volume of a storage or distribution medium, is called an "aggregate" if the compilation and its resulting copyright are not used to limit the access or legal rights of the compilation's users beyond what the individual works permit. Inclusion of a covered work in an aggregate does not cause this License to apply to the other parts of the aggregate.
6. Conveying Non-Source Forms.
You may convey a covered work in object code form under the terms of sections 4 and 5, provided that you also convey the machine-readable Corresponding Source under the terms of this License, in one of these ways:
* a) Convey the object code in, or embodied in, a physical product (including a physical distribution medium), accompanied by the Corresponding Source fixed on a durable physical medium customarily used for software interchange.
* b) Convey the object code in, or embodied in, a physical product (including a physical distribution medium), accompanied by a written offer, valid for at least three years and valid for as long as you offer spare parts or customer support for that product model, to give anyone who possesses the object code either (1) a copy of the Corresponding Source for all the software in the product that is covered by this License, on a durable physical medium customarily used for software interchange, for a price no more than your reasonable cost of physically performing this conveying of source, or (2) access to copy the Corresponding Source from a network server at no charge.
* c) Convey individual copies of the object code with a copy of the written offer to provide the Corresponding Source. This alternative is allowed only occasionally and noncommercially, and only if you received the object code with such an offer, in accord with subsection 6b.
* d) Convey the object code by offering access from a designated place (gratis or for a charge), and offer equivalent access to the Corresponding Source in the same way through the same place at no further charge. You need not require recipients to copy the Corresponding Source along with the object code. If the place to copy the object code is a network server, the Corresponding Source may be on a different server (operated by you or a third party) that supports equivalent copying facilities, provided you maintain clear directions next to the object code saying where to find the Corresponding Source. Regardless of what server hosts the Corresponding Source, you remain obligated to ensure that it is available for as long as needed to satisfy these requirements.
* e) Convey the object code using peer-to-peer transmission, provided you inform other peers where the object code and Corresponding Source of the work are being offered to the general public at no charge under subsection 6d.
A separable portion of the object code, whose source code is excluded from the Corresponding Source as a System Library, need not be included in conveying the object code work.
A "User Product" is either (1) a "consumer product", which means any tangible personal property which is normally used for personal, family, or household purposes, or (2) anything designed or sold for incorporation into a dwelling. In determining whether a product is a consumer product, doubtful cases shall be resolved in favor of coverage. For a particular product received by a particular user, "normally used" refers to a typical or common use of that class of product, regardless of the status of the particular user or of the way in which the particular user actually uses, or expects or is expected to use, the product. A product is a consumer product regardless of whether the product has substantial commercial, industrial or non-consumer uses, unless such uses represent the only significant mode of use of the product.
"Installation Information" for a User Product means any methods, procedures, authorization keys, or other information required to install and execute modified versions of a covered work in that User Product from a modified version of its Corresponding Source. The information must suffice to ensure that the continued functioning of the modified object code is in no case prevented or interfered with solely because modification has been made.
If you convey an object code work under this section in, or with, or specifically for use in, a User Product, and the conveying occurs as part of a transaction in which the right of possession and use of the User Product is transferred to the recipient in perpetuity or for a fixed term (regardless of how the transaction is characterized), the Corresponding Source conveyed under this section must be accompanied by the Installation Information. But this requirement does not apply if neither you nor any third party retains the ability to install modified object code on the User Product (for example, the work has been installed in ROM).
The requirement to provide Installation Information does not include a requirement to continue to provide support service, warranty, or updates for a work that has been modified or installed by the recipient, or for the User Product in which it has been modified or installed. Access to a network may be denied when the modification itself materially and adversely affects the operation of the network or violates the rules and protocols for communication across the network.
Corresponding Source conveyed, and Installation Information provided, in accord with this section must be in a format that is publicly documented (and with an implementation available to the public in source code form), and must require no special password or key for unpacking, reading or copying.
7. Additional Terms.
"Additional permissions" are terms that supplement the terms of this License by making exceptions from one or more of its conditions. Additional permissions that are applicable to the entire Program shall be treated as though they were included in this License, to the extent that they are valid under applicable law. If additional permissions apply only to part of the Program, that part may be used separately under those permissions, but the entire Program remains governed by this License without regard to the additional permissions.
When you convey a copy of a covered work, you may at your option remove any additional permissions from that copy, or from any part of it. (Additional permissions may be written to require their own removal in certain cases when you modify the work.) You may place additional permissions on material, added by you to a covered work, for which you have or can give appropriate copyright permission.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this License, for material you add to a covered work, you may (if authorized by the copyright holders of that material) supplement the terms of this License with terms:
* a) Disclaiming warranty or limiting liability differently from the terms of sections 15 and 16 of this License; or
* b) Requiring preservation of specified reasonable legal notices or author attributions in that material or in the Appropriate Legal Notices displayed by works containing it; or
* c) Prohibiting misrepresentation of the origin of that material, or requiring that modified versions of such material be marked in reasonable ways as different from the original version; or
* d) Limiting the use for publicity purposes of names of licensors or authors of the material; or
* e) Declining to grant rights under trademark law for use of some trade names, trademarks, or service marks; or
* f) Requiring indemnification of licensors and authors of that material by anyone who conveys the material (or modified versions of it) with contractual assumptions of liability to the recipient, for any liability that these contractual assumptions directly impose on those licensors and authors.
All other non-permissive additional terms are considered "further restrictions" within the meaning of section 10. If the Program as you received it, or any part of it, contains a notice stating that it is governed by this License along with a term that is a further restriction, you may remove that term. If a license document contains a further restriction but permits relicensing or conveying under this License, you may add to a covered work material governed by the terms of that license document, provided that the further restriction does not survive such relicensing or conveying.
If you add terms to a covered work in accord with this section, you must place, in the relevant source files, a statement of the additional terms that apply to those files, or a notice indicating where to find the applicable terms.
Additional terms, permissive or non-permissive, may be stated in the form of a separately written license, or stated as exceptions; the above requirements apply either way.
8. Termination.
You may not propagate or modify a covered work except as expressly provided under this License. Any attempt otherwise to propagate or modify it is void, and will automatically terminate your rights under this License (including any patent licenses granted under the third paragraph of section 11).
However, if you cease all violation of this License, then your license from a particular copyright holder is reinstated (a) provisionally, unless and until the copyright holder explicitly and finally terminates your license, and (b) permanently, if the copyright holder fails to notify you of the violation by some reasonable means prior to 60 days after the cessation.
Moreover, your license from a particular copyright holder is reinstated permanently if the copyright holder notifies you of the violation by some reasonable means, this is the first time you have received notice of violation of this License (for any work) from that copyright holder, and you cure the violation prior to 30 days after your receipt of the notice.
Termination of your rights under this section does not terminate the licenses of parties who have received copies or rights from you under this License. If your rights have been terminated and not permanently reinstated, you do not qualify to receive new licenses for the same material under section 10.
9. Acceptance Not Required for Having Copies.
You are not required to accept this License in order to receive or run a copy of the Program. Ancillary propagation of a covered work occurring solely as a consequence of using peer-to-peer transmission to receive a copy likewise does not require acceptance. However, nothing other than this License grants you permission to propagate or modify any covered work. These actions infringe copyright if you do not accept this License. Therefore, by modifying or propagating a covered work, you indicate your acceptance of this License to do so.
10. Automatic Licensing of Downstream Recipients.
Each time you convey a covered work, the recipient automatically receives a license from the original licensors, to run, modify and propagate that work, subject to this License. You are not responsible for enforcing compliance by third parties with this License.
An "entity transaction" is a transaction transferring control of an organization, or substantially all assets of one, or subdividing an organization, or merging organizations. If propagation of a covered work results from an entity transaction, each party to that transaction who receives a copy of the work also receives whatever licenses to the work the party's predecessor in interest had or could give under the previous paragraph, plus a right to possession of the Corresponding Source of the work from the predecessor in interest, if the predecessor has it or can get it with reasonable efforts.
You may not impose any further restrictions on the exercise of the rights granted or affirmed under this License. For example, you may not impose a license fee, royalty, or other charge for exercise of rights granted under this License, and you may not initiate litigation (including a cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that any patent claim is infringed by making, using, selling, offering for sale, or importing the Program or any portion of it.
11. Patents.
A "contributor" is a copyright holder who authorizes use under this License of the Program or a work on which the Program is based. The work thus licensed is called the contributor's "contributor version".
A contributor's "essential patent claims" are all patent claims owned or controlled by the contributor, whether already acquired or hereafter acquired, that would be infringed by some manner, permitted by this License, of making, using, or selling its contributor version, but do not include claims that would be infringed only as a consequence of further modification of the contributor version. For purposes of this definition, "control" includes the right to grant patent sublicenses in a manner consistent with the requirements of this License.
Each contributor grants you a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free patent license under the contributor's essential patent claims, to make, use, sell, offer for sale, import and otherwise run, modify and propagate the contents of its contributor version.
In the following three paragraphs, a "patent license" is any express agreement or commitment, however denominated, not to enforce a patent (such as an express permission to practice a patent or covenant not to sue for patent infringement). To "grant" such a patent license to a party means to make such an agreement or commitment not to enforce a patent against the party.
If you convey a covered work, knowingly relying on a patent license, and the Corresponding Source of the work is not available for anyone to copy, free of charge and under the terms of this License, through a publicly available network server or other readily accessible means, then you must either (1) cause the Corresponding Source to be so available, or (2) arrange to deprive yourself of the benefit of the patent license for this particular work, or (3) arrange, in a manner consistent with the requirements of this License, to extend the patent license to downstream recipients. "Knowingly relying" means you have actual knowledge that, but for the patent license, your conveying the covered work in a country, or your recipient's use of the covered work in a country, would infringe one or more identifiable patents in that country that you have reason to believe are valid.
If, pursuant to or in connection with a single transaction or arrangement, you convey, or propagate by procuring conveyance of, a covered work, and grant a patent license to some of the parties receiving the covered work authorizing them to use, propagate, modify or convey a specific copy of the covered work, then the patent license you grant is automatically extended to all recipients of the covered work and works based on it.
A patent license is "discriminatory" if it does not include within the scope of its coverage, prohibits the exercise of, or is conditioned on the non-exercise of one or more of the rights that are specifically granted under this License. You may not convey a covered work if you are a party to an arrangement with a third party that is in the business of distributing software, under which you make payment to the third party based on the extent of your activity of conveying the work, and under which the third party grants, to any of the parties who would receive the covered work from you, a discriminatory patent license (a) in connection with copies of the covered work conveyed by you (or copies made from those copies), or (b) primarily for and in connection with specific products or compilations that contain the covered work, unless you entered into that arrangement, or that patent license was granted, prior to 28 March 2007.
Nothing in this License shall be construed as excluding or limiting any implied license or other defenses to infringement that may otherwise be available to you under applicable patent law.
12. No Surrender of Others' Freedom.
If conditions are imposed on you (whether by court order, agreement or otherwise) that contradict the conditions of this License, they do not excuse you from the conditions of this License. If you cannot convey a covered work so as to satisfy simultaneously your obligations under this License and any other pertinent obligations, then as a consequence you may not convey it at all. For example, if you agree to terms that obligate you to collect a royalty for further conveying from those to whom you convey the Program, the only way you could satisfy both those terms and this License would be to refrain entirely from conveying the Program.
13. Use with the GNU Affero General Public License.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this License, you have permission to link or combine any covered work with a work licensed under version 3 of the GNU Affero General Public License into a single combined work, and to convey the resulting work. The terms of this License will continue to apply to the part which is the covered work, but the special requirements of the GNU Affero General Public License, section 13, concerning interaction through a network will apply to the combination as such.
14. Revised Versions of this License.
The Free Software Foundation may publish revised and/or new versions of the GNU General Public License from time to time. Such new versions will be similar in spirit to the present version, but may differ in detail to address new problems or concerns.
Each version is given a distinguishing version number. If the Program specifies that a certain numbered version of the GNU General Public License "or any later version" applies to it, you have the option of following the terms and conditions either of that numbered version or of any later version published by the Free Software Foundation. If the Program does not specify a version number of the GNU General Public License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation.
If the Program specifies that a proxy can decide which future versions of the GNU General Public License can be used, that proxy's public statement of acceptance of a version permanently authorizes you to choose that version for the Program.
Later license versions may give you additional or different permissions. However, no additional obligations are imposed on any author or copyright holder as a result of your choosing to follow a later version.
15. Disclaimer of Warranty.
THERE IS NO WARRANTY FOR THE PROGRAM, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW. EXCEPT WHEN OTHERWISE STATED IN WRITING THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND/OR OTHER PARTIES PROVIDE THE PROGRAM "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. THE ENTIRE RISK AS TO THE QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE PROGRAM IS WITH YOU. SHOULD THE PROGRAM PROVE DEFECTIVE, YOU ASSUME THE COST OF ALL NECESSARY SERVICING, REPAIR OR CORRECTION.
16. Limitation of Liability.
IN NO EVENT UNLESS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW OR AGREED TO IN WRITING WILL ANY COPYRIGHT HOLDER, OR ANY OTHER PARTY WHO MODIFIES AND/OR CONVEYS THE PROGRAM AS PERMITTED ABOVE, BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR DAMAGES, INCLUDING ANY GENERAL, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THE USE OR INABILITY TO USE THE PROGRAM (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOSS OF DATA OR DATA BEING RENDERED INACCURATE OR LOSSES SUSTAINED BY YOU OR THIRD PARTIES OR A FAILURE OF THE PROGRAM TO OPERATE WITH ANY OTHER PROGRAMS), EVEN IF SUCH HOLDER OR OTHER PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
17. Interpretation of Sections 15 and 16.
If the disclaimer of warranty and limitation of liability provided above cannot be given local legal effect according to their terms, reviewing courts shall apply local law that most closely approximates an absolute waiver of all civil liability in connection with the Program, unless a warranty or assumption of liability accompanies a copy of the Program in return for a fee.
END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Aptana GPL Exception
Section 7 Exception
As a special exception to the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License Version 3 (the "GPL"): You are free to convey a modified version that is formed entirely from this file (for purposes of this exception, the "Program" under the GPL) and the works identified at http://www.aptana.com/legal/gpl/exception/ (each a "FOSS Works"), which are conveyed to you by Aptana, Inc. and licensed under one or more of the licenses identified in the FOSS License List below (each a "FOSS License"), as long as:
1. you obey the GPL in all respects for the Program and the modified version, except for FOSS Works which are identifiable sections of the modified version, which are not derived from the Program, and which can reasonably be considered independent and separate works in themselves,
2. all FOSS Works which are identifiable sections of the modified version, which are not derived from the Program, and which can reasonably be considered independent and separate works in themselves,
a. are distributed subject to the FOSS License under which they were originally licensed, and
b. are not themselves modified from the form in which they are conveyed to you by Aptana, and
c. the object code or executable form of those sections are accompanied by the complete corresponding machine-readable source code for those sections, on the same medium as the corresponding object code or executable forms of those sections, and are licensed under the applicable FOSS License as the corresponding object code or
3. any works which are aggregated with the Program, or with a modified version on a volume of a storage or distribution medium in accordance with the GPL, are aggregates (as defined in Section 5 of the GPL) which can reasonably be considered independent and separate works in themselves and which are not modified versions of either the Program, a modified version, or a FOSS Work.
If the above conditions are not met, then the Program may only be copied, modified, distributed or used under the terms and conditions of the GPL or another valid licensing option from Aptana, Inc. Terms used but not defined in the foregoing paragraph have the meanings given in the GPL.
FOSS License List
1. Apache Software License: version 1.0, 1.1, 2.0
2. Eclipse Public License: version 1.0
3. GNU General Public License: version 2.0
4. GNU Lesser General Public License: version 2.0
5. License of Jaxen
6. License of HTML jTidy
7. Mozilla Public License: version 1.1
8. W3C License
9. BSD License
10. MIT License
This list may be modified by Aptana from time to time. See Aptana's website for the latest version.
Attribution Requirement
This license does not grant any license or rights to use the trademarks "Aptana," any "Aptana" logos, or any other trademarks of Aptana, Inc. You are not authorized to use the name Aptana or the names of any author or contributor for publicity purposes, without written authorization.
However, in addition to the other notice obligations of this License, all copies of any covered work conveyed by you must include on each user interface screen and in the Appropriate Legal Notices the following text: "Powered by Aptana". On user interface screens, this text must be visibly and clearly displayed in the title bar, status bar, or otherwise directly in the view that is in focus.
Aptana Public License
The Aptana Public License is designed to allow you the freedom to use Aptana products without restriction, except for redistribution. We at Aptana want you to not only use Aptana for web development, but also freely share scripts, snippets, websites and other items with friends and coworkers, and to encourage others to use and adopt Aptana as well. However, we require that you do not redistribute the Aptana Studio itself. If you are interested in redistributing Aptana or have a question, please contact us at license@aptana.com.
Aptana Public License - 1.0
THE PROGRAM (AS DEFINED BELOW) IS PROVIDED UNDER THE TERMS OF THIS APTANA PUBLIC LICENSE ("LICENSE"). THE PROGRAM IS PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT AND/OR OTHER APPLICABLE LAW. BY EXERCISING ANY RIGHTS TO THE PROGRAM PROVIDED HERE, YOU ACCEPT AND AGREE TO BE BOUND BY THE TERMS OF THIS LICENSE.
THIS LICENSE GRANTS PERMISSIONS ONLY FOR YOUR INTERNAL USE (AS DEFINED BELOW). IF YOU WISH TO DISTRIBUTE OR MAKE OTHER USES OF THE PROGRAM, PLEASE CONTACT APTANA.
1. Definitions. When used in this License:
"Aptana" means Aptana, Inc.
"Internal Use" means use by You for Your personal or internal business purposes only, specifically excluding any use, distribution, or communication of the Program or any derivative work of the Program in any way such that the Program or any derivative work of the Program may be used by anyone other than You, whether those works are distributed or communicated to those persons or otherwise made available for use over a network.
"Program" means the code and documentation owned by Aptana and distributed under this License by Aptana. In case of any doubt as to whether any code or documentation is part of the Program covered by this license, the notices placed by Aptana in the source code or documentation will govern
"You" means an individual or a legal entity exercising rights under, and complying with all of the terms of, this License. For legal entities, You includes any entity which controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with You. For purposes of this definition, control means (a) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the direction or management of such entity, whether by contract or otherwise, or (b) ownership of more than fifty percent (50%) of the outstanding shares or beneficial ownership of such entity.
2. License Grants
a) Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, Aptana hereby grants to You a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free copyright license to reproduce, prepare derivative works of, install, and execute the Program in source code and object code form, in each case solely for Your Internal Use.
b) Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, Aptana hereby grants to You a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, patent license under Aptana?s Licensed Patent Claims to make and use the Program in source code and object code form, in each case solely for Your Internal Use. As used herein, "Licensed Patent Claims" means only those patent claims owned by Aptana that are necessarily infringed by Your making and using the Program for Your Internal Use. Notwithstanding this Section 2.1(b), no patent license is granted: (i) for code that You delete from the Program or (ii) for infringements caused by: (1) the modification of the Program or (2) the combination of the Program with other software or devices.
3. Certain Limitations and Conditions
You are not licensed under this License to distribute the Program or derivative works thereof, or to make any use other than Internal Use of the Program or derivative works thereof.
You may not remove or alter any copyright or other proprietary rights notices, or other means of attribution, contained within the Program.
4. No Warranty
Aptana represents that to its knowledge as of the date of first publication of the Program under this License, it has sufficient copyright rights in the Program, to grant the copyright license set forth in this License.
EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY SET FORTH IN THIS SECTION 4, THE PROGRAM IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. You are solely responsible for determining the appropriateness of using and reproducing the Program and assume any and all risks associated with its exercise of rights under this License, including but not limited to the risks and costs of program errors, compliance with applicable laws, damage to or loss of data, programs or equipment, and unavailability or interruption of operations.
Without limiting the foregoing, Aptana provides no assurances that the Program does not infringe the patent or other intellectual property rights of any third party. Aptana disclaims any liability for claims based on infringement of intellectual property rights or otherwise. As a condition to exercising the rights and licenses granted hereunder, You hereby assume sole responsibility to secure any other intellectual property rights needed, if any. For example, if a third party patent license is required to allow You to use the Program, it is Your responsibility to acquire that license before using the Program.
5. Limitation of Liability
To the maximum extent permissible by applicable law, in no event and under no legal theory, whether in tort (including negligence and strict liability), contract, or otherwise, shall Aptana be liable to You for damages, including any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising as a result of this License or out of the use or inability to use the Program (including but not limited to damages for loss of goodwill, work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all other commercial damages or losses), even if Aptana has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
6. General
This License represents the complete agreement concerning subject matter hereof. If any provision of this License is invalid or unenforceable under applicable law, it shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remainder of the terms of this License, and without further action by the parties hereto, such provision shall be reformed to the minimum extent necessary to make such provision valid and enforceable.
Except as expressly stated in Section 2 above, You receive no rights or licenses to the intellectual property of Aptana under this License, whether expressly, by implication, estoppel or otherwise. In particular, without limitation, this License does not grant permission to use the trade names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of Aptana. All rights in the Program not expressly granted under this License are reserved.
If You institute patent litigation against any entity (including a cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Program constitutes direct or contributory patent infringement, then any patent licenses granted to You under this License for that Program shall terminate as of the date such litigation is filed.
All Your rights under this License shall terminate if You fail to comply with any of the terms or conditions of this License and do not cure such failure in a reasonable period of time after becoming aware of such noncompliance. If all Your rights under this License terminate, You agree to cease use of the Program as soon as reasonably practicable. However, Your obligations under this License, and this Section 6, shall continue and survive.
This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of California and the intellectual property laws of the United States of America, without reference to conflicts of laws principles that would require the application of the laws of any other jurisdiction. The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods is expressly excluded. No party to this License will bring a legal action under this License more than one year after the cause of action arose. Any law or regulation which provides that the language of a contract shall be construed against the drafter shall not apply to this License. You agree that You alone are responsible for compliance with the United States export administration regulations (and the export control laws and regulation of any other countries) when You exercise rights under this License.
[^] # Re: Aptana propriétaire ?
Posté par GeneralZod . Évalué à 3.
http://linuxfr.org/2007/09/22/23130.html
# Eclipse vs la concurrence
Posté par MiniMoi . Évalué à 4.
Au boulot on a le choix enter IntelliJ et Eclipse, mais comme presque toute mon equipe utilise IntelliJ, je m'y suis mis aussi (c'est la premiere fois que je fais du Java, et j'etais plutot emacs avant).
Et apres une premiere impression negative, je trouve que c'est un fantastique outil, et les rarees fois ou j'ai du ecrire du Java avec emacs furent des experiences moins plaisantes.
De plus, je vois que mes quelques collegues qui utilisent Eclipse ont l'air de peiner a faire des choses qui sont triviales avec IntelliJ.
Que dit la sagesse Linuxfr-ienne de ca ?
(Note: ceci n'est pas un troll, je ne connais pas Eclipse, et je n'ai malheureusement pas le temps d'essayer de voir si ca me plait, et si j'utilise emacs et pas vi c'est que c'est simplement la premiere chose qui m'est tombe sous la main, et apres une courbe d'apprentissage bien raide j'en suis tres content).
[^] # Re: Eclipse vs la concurrence
Posté par Earered . Évalué à 2.
Qu'elle n'est pas la meilleur ressource pour tous ce qui est java, cf:
http://www.developpez.net/forums/showthread.php?t=468233
pour la réponse
[^] # Re: Eclipse vs la concurrence
Posté par MiniMoi . Évalué à 1.
Dois-je en déduire qu'IntelliJ est meilleur ?
Personne pour dire qu'IntelliJ suxxxxxxx, et d'expliquer pourquoi ? (Oui je sais, sapusèpalibr)
[^] # Re: Eclipse vs la concurrence
Posté par Earered . Évalué à 3.
Bah, c'est pas vraiment un problème : ceux qui connaissent les deux utilisent les deux mais ont une préférence pour IntelliJ
Ce qui un peu différent de ceux qui découvre netbeans parcequ'ils doivent faire des ihm swing, et qui après avoir passer la barrière de l'apprentissage reste complètement sur netbeans.
> Dois-je en déduire qu'IntelliJ est meilleur ?
P'tet sur quelques points pour un individu
> Personne pour dire qu'IntelliJ suxxxxxxx, et d'expliquer pourquoi ? (Oui je sais, sapusèpalibr)
C'est p'tet la parenthèse le point le plus important : pour eclipse il y a plein de partenaires, et ses gros utilisateurs (consultant/partenaires oracle/jboss-redhat/intalio/etc...) participent à son développement ou développement de plugin.
Payer 500€ par consultant, avec le turnover que peuvent avoir ces boîtes rend peut être eclipse meilleur que intelliJ.
[^] # Re: Eclipse vs la concurrence
Posté par Jean B . Évalué à 2.
[^] # Re: Eclipse vs la concurrence
Posté par Nelis (site web personnel) . Évalué à 1.
Ceci dit, je ne me plains pas, Eclipse est un excellent IDE même si j'aurais rêvé que l'éditeur d'IntelliJ soit intégré dans Eclipse ;-)
[^] # Re: Eclipse vs la concurrence
Posté par Ummon . Évalué à 2.
[^] # Re: Eclipse vs la concurrence
Posté par Etienne Juliot (site web personnel) . Évalué à 5.
AInsi, depuis Eclipse 1.0, tu as le droit à une interface native à ton OS (ça ne se voit même pas visuellement que c'est du Java dessous, et c'est bcp plus réactif).
Les communautés ne sont carrément pas dans la même proportion. C'est du x20 en faveur d'Eclipse.
NetBeans est un surtout un IDE. Eclipse, c'est en plus d'un IDE et d'un socle technologique, une fondation avec une vraie stratégie et des actions concrètes.
NetBeans essaie de sortir de son image très Java. Eclipse a très tôt pris le virage vers C, PHP, XML, SGBD, ...
Netbeans est meilleur pour faire du Swing. (vis à vis d'un Eclipse OpenSource)
Autre différence, Eclipse est le socle de bcp d'outils commerciaux (eux même sous forme de plugins). Mine de rien, ça rassure pas mal de monde, et ça prouve une super complémentarité OpenSource / Proprio.
[^] # Re: Eclipse vs la concurrence
Posté par Ummon . Évalué à 1.
Ce même pote me rappel de temps en temps : "AWT ça pue, c'est dépendant de la plateforme" sous entendu qu'un code Java utilisant AWT qui a été compilé pour une plateforme ne sera pas portable mais devra être recompilé pour chaque plateforme.
Le "Compile once, run everywhere" de Java en prend un coup.
Est-ce un argument justifié ?
[^] # Re: Eclipse vs la concurrence
Posté par Ummon . Évalué à 2.
[^] # Re: Eclipse vs la concurrence
Posté par wismerhill . Évalué à 2.
Par contre tes propres classes, si elles sont pur java, n'auront pas besoin d'être recompilée, juste que le jar adéquat SWT soit disponible dans le classpath.
[^] # Re: Eclipse vs la concurrence
Posté par LupusMic (site web personnel, Mastodon) . Évalué à 0.
[^] # Re: Eclipse vs la concurrence
Posté par Jean B . Évalué à 2.
C'est sur que le confort est pas top mais pou des petites modifs de dernières minutes c'est parfait.
[^] # Re: Eclipse vs la concurrence
Posté par Etienne Juliot (site web personnel) . Évalué à 1.
C'était la principale à l'époque de mon basculement de JBuilder à Eclipse.
[^] # Re: Eclipse vs la concurrence
Posté par Infernal Quack (site web personnel) . Évalué à 4.
- IntelliJ IDEA
- NetBeans
- Eclispe
Et en effet, quand on a gouté à IDEA, difficile d'utiliser autre chose. Contrairement à Eclispe qui est tout en plugin, IDEA fournit de base une intégration parfaite pour faire du Java.
Et puis je n'aime pas du tout le look&feel d'Eclipse comme les onglets énorme et qui bouffe de la place inutilement.
Bon par contre, IDEA c'est pas donné (mais c'est pas moi qui paye).
L'association LinuxFr ne saurait être tenue responsable des propos légalement repréhensibles ou faisant allusion à l'évêque de Rome, au chef de l'Église catholique romaine ou au chef temporel de l'État du Vatican et se trouvant dans ce commentaire
[^] # Re: Eclipse vs la concurrence
Posté par Etienne Juliot (site web personnel) . Évalué à 1.
Du coup, tu as un espace de travail de quasi tout l'écran.
Perso, c'est ça que j'adore chez Eclipse : c'est qu'on peut en 3 clics se faire son propre arrangement d'espace de travail.
Et pour l'aspect plugin, c'est bizarre ce que tu dis. Tu verras que tous les gros softs se dirigent vers une approche plugins (Firefox, OpenOffice, Eclipse, Apache, ...) car ça simplifie l'architecture pour les développeurs et ça rend le résultat plus modulable pour l'utilisateur.
Le problème que ça posait, c'est qu'il fallait s'installer soit même les bons plugins. Et ça, c'est résolu avec Eclipse 3.4 qui fourni des distributions Eclipse toutes prêtes.
[^] # Re: Eclipse vs la concurrence
Posté par Infernal Quack (site web personnel) . Évalué à 3.
L'association LinuxFr ne saurait être tenue responsable des propos légalement repréhensibles ou faisant allusion à l'évêque de Rome, au chef de l'Église catholique romaine ou au chef temporel de l'État du Vatican et se trouvant dans ce commentaire
# P2
Posté par anakin . Évalué à 2.
Sinon, je sais pas pour vous, mais je le trouve un peu plus réactif que Europa...
# leger troll
Posté par abramov_MS . Évalué à 3.
A quand son inclusion dans Debian/Ubuntu? Parceque les deux sont encore a la version 3.2...
[^] # Re: leger troll
Posté par Jean-Philippe (site web personnel) . Évalué à 1.
Contient le lien vers le bug debian associé
# Liste des nouveautés
Posté par Etienne Juliot (site web personnel) . Évalué à 3.
Du coup, les commentaires ci desssus ne parlent quasiment que de la plateforme, et de pas tous les projets qui sont inclus dans la distrib Eclipse.
Pour tenter de palier en partie à ce problème, j'ai fait une petite liste sur mon petit blog des nouveautés côté Eclipse Modeling : http://www.mda4eclipse.com/2008/06/eclipse-34-ganymede-news-(...)
Ca pointe directement sur les captures d'écrans des nouveautés. Si ça peut servir à du monde, c'est avec plaisir.
Suivre le flux des commentaires
Note : les commentaires appartiennent à celles et ceux qui les ont postés. Nous n’en sommes pas responsables.